ANSI SCTE 230-2016 pdf free download – Recommended Practice for Proper Handling of Audio- Video Synchronization in Cable Systems

02-20-2022 comment

ANSI SCTE 230-2016 pdf free download – Recommended Practice for Proper Handling of Audio- Video Synchronization in Cable Systems.
5. Audio Video Synchronization Background and Detection
5.1. Detection and Visibility Today’s complex ‘source to sink’ flow of digital audio and video includes many active processing steps that may result in undesired changes to the relative timing of video to the related audio. This relationship is commonly called “Lip Sync” – and it is annoying to viewers when the difference in synchronization is great. Lip Sync errors have occurred since motion pictures had sound (including phonograph records accompanying a film evolving through sound-on-film projector loops to a separate sound head). Concerns about Lip Sync errors have remained through analog television to the digital transition and codecs and transport systems. In fact, the ‘transition’ to digital displays has made Lip Sync errors potentially worse. The video input-to- picture output to the viewer delay (“Latency”) was very straightforward with CRT displays, however, contemporary fixed-panel display designs almost-always contain frame-buffers, frame-rate conversion, temporal noise reduction and other signal processing that can introduce significant Latency, including variations in the Latency that are not consistent nor known to external audio equipment.Existing
standards (ITU BT.1359) [3] were made with standard definition CRTs not HD fixed-panel displays.Noupdate has been done to the existing ITU standard since the introduction of these new displays.
Ultimately, Lip Sync errors can be objectively measured- but such ‘scientific’measurementstraditionally require out-of-service procedures with test patterns and tones. However, consumercomplaints often begin with a “something doesn’t ‘look right”” complaint, based on subjective
observation.Unfortunately, some lip-sync visibility may be part of the original content production processwhich can’t (shouldn ‘ty be corrected by adjustments downstream.
5.1.1.Objective Measurements
As noted, objective measurements may be made with test patterns and audio tones as an out-of-serviceprocess – which may not be via a production workflow or signal path, potentially bypassing the malfunctioning path.
Examples of objective measurements are the VALID test signal (as-of this writing, used by HBO duringmonthly transmission tests; see: homeboxoffice.com (TechOps section), for 2016:
https://www.homeboxoffice.com/TechOps%20Docs/2016_Transmission_Tests%20w_Logos.pdf )
General information about the VALID device: http://www.visuals-switzerland.net’attachment.php?id_attachment=2487
5.1.2. Visual / Aural Observation
Trained observers can detect Lip Sync errors within a few frames.This document does not attempt toprovide a full course in how to observe errors to such a precise level, but certain visual cues in programcontent are easy to see and can be used to trigger further investigation of a potential problem. Suchobservations could include: Visual cues such as a gun-shot ( sound and picture should be matched) ordrum thump / symbol crash with drumstick visible are good clues that may conveniently occur during abrief period of watching a program.Generally, audio dialog is more subtle and can be impacted bydubbing and dialog replacement during production processes. Also note that some production choicesinclude items that may be improperly identified as an error such as a distant explosion that would includea delay – as sound is normally delayed in physics / nature.
Specific test materials can be authored (e.g. a VOD asset) and made available to consumers to have a”reference” known asset to visually verify (for non-expert viewers) that Lip Sync is correct and othertroubleshooting is warranted.
5.2. Synchronization Error Budget
Several human-factors studies have been done to determine visibility and acceptability for Lip Syncerrors. A “pass-fail*specification is beyond the scope of this document. However, the threshold of
“consumer complaints” is generally a threshold that should not be exceeded.Thus, the following examplefrom ITU-R BT.1359 [3] may be used for guidance, noting the caution at the beginning of this sectionconcerning the impact of fixed-panel displays on this recommended practice.ANSI SCTE 230 pdf download.

Download infomation Go to download
Note: If you can share this website on your Facebook,Twitter or others,I will share more.

LEAVE A REPLY

Anonymous netizen Fill in information